As a result of the enthusiastic response, I will be conducting the Reincarnation Class Version 3 this coming Wednesday November 26 at 7 PM.  Needless to say, expecting everybody would be traveling since it was so close to Thanksgiving, did not expect anybody to be in town on that particular evening.

To those of you who of experience Version 1 and Version 2 of the Reincarnation Experiments, there are two distinct qualities involved in the perception.

In order to understand the need for Version 3, we’ll go over the differences, not to mention some of the observations. In Version 1 the experiment was designed to do one thing. That was without any prompting individuals making the observations were able to perceive another person’s appearance as they were in a past life.

Along with that information received, sometimes there were some additional information revealed of which was later verified as having a direct effect on the individual and experiences of their life this time around.

Version 2 was little different. Here we took the approach of having the person face away from those making the observations.  The reason for this was to get an idea of the time the person existed, what they saw and/or felt.

In some cases during Version 2, a story would appear have a deep meanings and/or bringing about an understanding of certain individuals characteristics.  In our last exercise utilizing version 2 techniques we were able to come up with the name and identity of the person as they were in a past life.

Now while many of you who may be reading this not taken the classes, they find some of this hard to believe, that is okay. In all the working classes that I perform, I do everything in my ability to remove any possibility of results obtained through the process of belief. I purposely set things up in such a way so as the intellect is no longer interfering with what they should be seeing, but rather individuals have no idea what to expect.  Where this gets interesting in these experiments is that independently individuals are polled and they give their reports. This gets pretty satisfying to other members who may not be all that confident in what they perceive; finding validation of their reports from other individuals of nearly the exact same item they perceived also.

Version 3 will again have the individual in the observation chair; however they will take two positions. The first position will be facing away from us, or we will draw a picture frame around the individual for the purpose of knowing of whom else was involved, likenesses and little bit more of the story.  The second position will be of a profile. I think you’ll find the second position most interesting as it will reveal certain qualities and aspects regarding this exercise.

I would like to change the subjects for minute.

Previously I have commented about the nature of Belief versus that of Gnosis. The strange thing about belief is that while the basic premise is not an incorrect process is. It is far too easy to adapt a belief relying on what somebody else’s told you versus taking the time to know the nature of that which is being promoted first-hand. And I am not finding fault in these two different processes. That is not our purpose here, and would be futile to carry such an attitude.

The only real issue/complaint many might have regarding the process of belief, is the fear of separation, desire to get others to go along with what they believe so you can feel better about yourself and your actions, and even to extreme actions through intimidation, fear, and even war, will be a direct result of this attempt to compensate for the gap of separation. We are currently seing these examples in the extremes in various parts the world.

However, we would be remiss in assuming that we to are innocent of such activities in our past.

In order to resolve these particular issues, a move towards the process of Gnosis must be embraced by each and every one of us. When you take the path of first-hand knowledge, it becomes ours. We do not have to substantiate it. We do not have to justify it. We know that it is, because we have tested, and validated it.

When we have that confidence of first-hand knowledge, and/or enlightenment, then will find peace in our world. Doing so brings about that acceptance and Loving Light allowing others to be without the wisdom we carry, (Or so we think).

We must also be fair and understanding in this determination, for there are many people who are at peace through the process of belief. When we find these individuals, they exude the light in all the good qualities one could ever ask for. The question is, did they discover this through their own internal process of Gnosis?

And, what are these qualities that I speak of? Are they not of Love, Understanding, and Compassion? Are these not also the qualities taught by teachers of humanity throughout the years?

Have you ever noticed when you are separate and primarily in your head worrying about this or that, your breathing becomes shallow? There are even times we might find that your chest becomes stiff, discomfort in the mid and lower back area, and even difficulty in swallowing.

Belief, being an intellectual process, such process being formed from a collection of assumptions and/or best guesses might cause us to be in our head too much. However, when we find those people whom the process of belief becomes a process of Gnosis, it is the intellect which started the process, but their desire to do good work reestablishes the connection to that which is all, however by the process of belief many are convinced that the connection was broken to begin with.

So, how can we determine whether or not we are in harmony, moving towards that Unconditional Love that exists in all qualities and/or manifestations allowing the existence of us complete with freedom of choice to either know, or believe?

Peace,